<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for teleskopos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>History of science - Museums</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book review: Venus Seen on the Sun by Nachrichten aus der Astro-Geschichte kompakt &#124; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/06/12/book-review-venus-seen-on-the-sun/#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nachrichten aus der Astro-Geschichte kompakt &#124; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1584#comment-1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#8220;Venus in Sole visa&#8221; von Jeremiah Horrocks wurde letztes Jahr neu aus dem Lateinischen übersetzt &#8211; und das erste Mal überhaupt sorgfältig und kompetent ins Englische: Die &#8220;Venus vor [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Venus in Sole visa&#8221; von Jeremiah Horrocks wurde letztes Jahr neu aus dem Lateinischen übersetzt &#8211; und das erste Mal überhaupt sorgfältig und kompetent ins Englische: Die &#8220;Venus vor [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government funding for &#039;pure&#039; research: an extremely brief and gappy history by The benefits of hindsight: how history can contribute to science policy &#124; teleskopos</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2010/09/29/government-funding-for-pure-research-an-extremely-brief-and-gappy-history/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The benefits of hindsight: how history can contribute to science policy &#124; teleskopos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whewellsghost.wordpress.com/?p=232#comment-1702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] that pure scientific research is the best means of producing new and unexpected technologies dates back to the 19th century and has been corralled into support for increased state funding of science ever [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that pure scientific research is the best means of producing new and unexpected technologies dates back to the 19th century and has been corralled into support for increased state funding of science ever [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gulliver&#8217;s travels in science and satire by Rashid Faridi</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/04/01/gullivers-travels-in-science-and-satire/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rashid Faridi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1569#comment-1692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://rashidfaridi.com/2013/06/13/gullivers-travels-in-science-and-satire/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rashid&#039;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://rashidfaridi.com/2013/06/13/gullivers-travels-in-science-and-satire/" rel="nofollow">Rashid&#039;s Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book review: Venus Seen on the Sun by Nafees Chaudhary</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/06/12/book-review-venus-seen-on-the-sun/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nafees Chaudhary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1584#comment-1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://jugraphia.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/book-review-venus-seen-on-the-sun/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jugraphia Slate&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://jugraphia.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/book-review-venus-seen-on-the-sun/" rel="nofollow">Jugraphia Slate</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Relevant History &#124; Leaping Robot Blog &#124; Patrick McCray</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/about-2/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Relevant History &#124; Leaping Robot Blog &#124; Patrick McCray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?page_id=1041#comment-1656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a crack at reconsidering how history can contribute to science policy. In their 11 April post, Rebekah Higgitt and James Wilsdon make the persuasive case that the humanities can contribute to science policy [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a crack at reconsidering how history can contribute to science policy. In their 11 April post, Rebekah Higgitt and James Wilsdon make the persuasive case that the humanities can contribute to science policy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Picturing science: the eyes have it by Beto Pimentel</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/picturing-science-the-eyes-have-it/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beto Pimentel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1571#comment-1648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a finding! Thank you for this image, Becky. I can give my whole optics highschool course digging things out of it! And I am just beginning it again right now. Perfect timing too.
Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a finding! Thank you for this image, Becky. I can give my whole optics highschool course digging things out of it! And I am just beginning it again right now. Perfect timing too.<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on School history: what worked for me by Rebekah Higgitt</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/school-history-what-worked-for-me/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebekah Higgitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1553#comment-1612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That dates you, John, if you were at school in Gove&#039;s halcyon days! ;-)

I recall plenty of poor and not-so-good as well as the good at school. This history teacher had a thing about writing titles in small caps, I seem to recall... He was also convinced that girls/women did not make good historians - apparently they can&#039;t see the wood for the trees, or something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That dates you, John, if you were at school in Gove&#8217;s halcyon days! <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I recall plenty of poor and not-so-good as well as the good at school. This history teacher had a thing about writing titles in small caps, I seem to recall&#8230; He was also convinced that girls/women did not make good historians &#8211; apparently they can&#8217;t see the wood for the trees, or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on School history: what worked for me by John Heard</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/school-history-what-worked-for-me/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Heard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1553#comment-1611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only just catching up with this excellent blog - very interesting! I&#039;m amazed, and envious, that anyone finds anything that happened in school inspiring or interesting; I hated school, and everything connected therewith. Only two things do I remember about school history. One is of being taught, at the age of about 12, by Julian Ayer, who may still at that time have believed himself to be the son of Sir Freddie Ayer, but whose father was actually Sir Stuart Hampshire. When as an adult Julian was eventually told this interesting fact he apparently flew into an hysterical rage and broke all the glass in the house, which it is strange to imagine one&#039;s history teacher doing. He was one of the few civilised masters at school, but was obsessed by the organisation of topic headings - a reflection of Sir Freddie&#039;s philosophy, perhaps? Many hours were spent in exchanges like this:

Me - Sir, sir, please sir, please, does the Statute of Merton have to be indented twice?
Ayer - No, of course not, you indent it once and underline it, like Magna Carta.
Second Child - Sir, I&#039;ve underlined Magna Carta twice. Is that correct?
Ayer - Of course it isn&#039;t! Magna Carta and the Statute of Merton should be underlined once.
Me - Like the Constitutions of Clarendon?
Ayer - Give me strength! The Constitutions of Clarendon is main sub-heading E, so you don&#039;t indent it at all, but underline it with a pecked line!
Etc etc

The consequence of this regime was that at the end of the year I was 29th out of 30 in history, and Mr Ayer&#039;s comment on my report was &#039;He has a long way to go if he wants to become a historian.&#039; My mother, bless her, loved history and was very disappointed by this result, but thought the comment remarkably silly, as did I. Mr Ayer died saving his wife in the Boxing Day Tsunami of 2004.

The other memory is of being accused by my history teacher (not Mr Ayer), in front of the whole class, of cheating in the history mock O-level. I was in danger of being barred from taking the O-level itself, but very fortunately I was able to make him look stupid (which wasn&#039;t difficult) and prove my innocence by repeating the answers from memory there and then; I really had revised well, and got my best O-level pass in history.

History bascially meant British history, which suited me, and it was taught in a totally chronological fashion. By the time primary school was over you should have been up to speed on the Anglo-Saxons, villeins, the feudal system, strip farming and King Alfred. Then you progressed towards O-level at roughly two centuries a year, running into the buffers of the First World War about five years later. From what little I know of the present proposals, it seems as if the history I was taught was history a la Gove! Unfortunately we also had to do American history as a special subject, and I heartily disliked it, not least because it was too recent; I was firmly convinced that proper history (a) was British, and (b) had more or less ended with Queen Anne.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only just catching up with this excellent blog &#8211; very interesting! I&#8217;m amazed, and envious, that anyone finds anything that happened in school inspiring or interesting; I hated school, and everything connected therewith. Only two things do I remember about school history. One is of being taught, at the age of about 12, by Julian Ayer, who may still at that time have believed himself to be the son of Sir Freddie Ayer, but whose father was actually Sir Stuart Hampshire. When as an adult Julian was eventually told this interesting fact he apparently flew into an hysterical rage and broke all the glass in the house, which it is strange to imagine one&#8217;s history teacher doing. He was one of the few civilised masters at school, but was obsessed by the organisation of topic headings &#8211; a reflection of Sir Freddie&#8217;s philosophy, perhaps? Many hours were spent in exchanges like this:</p>
<p>Me &#8211; Sir, sir, please sir, please, does the Statute of Merton have to be indented twice?<br />
Ayer &#8211; No, of course not, you indent it once and underline it, like Magna Carta.<br />
Second Child &#8211; Sir, I&#8217;ve underlined Magna Carta twice. Is that correct?<br />
Ayer &#8211; Of course it isn&#8217;t! Magna Carta and the Statute of Merton should be underlined once.<br />
Me &#8211; Like the Constitutions of Clarendon?<br />
Ayer &#8211; Give me strength! The Constitutions of Clarendon is main sub-heading E, so you don&#8217;t indent it at all, but underline it with a pecked line!<br />
Etc etc</p>
<p>The consequence of this regime was that at the end of the year I was 29th out of 30 in history, and Mr Ayer&#8217;s comment on my report was &#8216;He has a long way to go if he wants to become a historian.&#8217; My mother, bless her, loved history and was very disappointed by this result, but thought the comment remarkably silly, as did I. Mr Ayer died saving his wife in the Boxing Day Tsunami of 2004.</p>
<p>The other memory is of being accused by my history teacher (not Mr Ayer), in front of the whole class, of cheating in the history mock O-level. I was in danger of being barred from taking the O-level itself, but very fortunately I was able to make him look stupid (which wasn&#8217;t difficult) and prove my innocence by repeating the answers from memory there and then; I really had revised well, and got my best O-level pass in history.</p>
<p>History bascially meant British history, which suited me, and it was taught in a totally chronological fashion. By the time primary school was over you should have been up to speed on the Anglo-Saxons, villeins, the feudal system, strip farming and King Alfred. Then you progressed towards O-level at roughly two centuries a year, running into the buffers of the First World War about five years later. From what little I know of the present proposals, it seems as if the history I was taught was history a la Gove! Unfortunately we also had to do American history as a special subject, and I heartily disliked it, not least because it was too recent; I was firmly convinced that proper history (a) was British, and (b) had more or less ended with Queen Anne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on School history: what worked for me by Rebekah Higgitt</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/school-history-what-worked-for-me/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebekah Higgitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1553#comment-1605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know them - looks interesting, though, so many thanks for the link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know them &#8211; looks interesting, though, so many thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on School history: what worked for me by Michael Fugate</title>
		<link>http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/school-history-what-worked-for-me/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fugate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teleskopos.wordpress.com/?p=1553#comment-1604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think of the National Academies Press&#039;s works on teaching and learning history?
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11100]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of the National Academies Press&#8217;s works on teaching and learning history?<br />
<a href="http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11100" rel="nofollow">http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11100</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
